Monday, May 16, 2005

African Scam Alert - Godwin Ojo

This is the full text of the African Scam reached my gmail box this time.

So you see the power of internet search engines, these Scammer's must have gone into the search & got my email from my blog's.

If you have receive the same kind of email or letter's please don't respond to it.

You may lost money & even your life.





Dear Charlie Tan,

I humbly wish to seek your assistance in a matter that is very important and needs utmost trust and confidence. I am Mr.Godwin Ojo, a business consultant and close confidant of one of the ADC to Mr Laurent Kabilla,the late president of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The issue is this, the wife to one of the top government official and an oil royalist who served in Kabilla's regime wishes to move out from Lome-Togo,the sum of US$7.2million.

She is very willing to invest the aforementioned sum in a viable investment overseas. For obvious reasons, my client does not wish to place this fund with established financial institution in the family's name for security reasons. It is her desire that the deal be handled as quietly as possible without any leakage to the public or the incumbent government as they have suffered a great lost in the past.

She has therefore empowered and instructed me to look for a reliable foreigner who can arrange and receive the money into his or her account oversea and assist to invest the fund properly for the family. If you agree to act as a fund manager for my client and her family, I shall arrange to release the sum of US$7.2Million to you if you meet my requirement and upon a favourable response from you. I shall let you know how you will receive it.

I guarantee that this will be executed under legitimate arrangement that will protect you and I to this effect.At the conclusion of this business you will be given 20% of the total amount,75% will for be for my client,while 5% will be for any expenses both parties might have incurred during the process, Be informed that arrangements have been made for you to receive this fund any where you want the fund to be transfered for claim where you will sign the necessary documents for the release of the fund to your choice/designated bank account.

If you are capable and willing to participate in this transaction, reach me immediately.In any case, please keep it tight secret.After confirming your acceptance arrangements will be made on how the fund will leave.

As I anxiously await your soonest positive response.

Goodbye and GOD bless.

Best regards.

Mr Godwin Ojo.

Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

"Yahoo! is more than just a search"

The folowing is the interview with Terry Semel, CEO of Yahoo:

He thinks that the "Internet is becoming more and more relevant to people’s lives. Entire generation are now growing up with the Internet, which is becoming more relevant and significant, regardless of whether it’s on a computer, mobile devices, or in the future becomes part of television. I regard it as the ability of our community to access information and Yahoo!’s Internet functions from wherever they may be in the world, from any device they are using. The possibilities are very far-reaching.”

In my pinion as per my vision back in 1989 at the "Information Technology for The Future in Nagoya" It is a network emcompass:

Local - LAN
Wide Area - WAN
Gobal Access - GAN


Together with the

Computer's/ Processor's/ Multi-Microprocessor's

Communication Processor's


Man-Machine Interface is the key Area of Growth & You see the convergent of Multi-Media on the Digital Network (Which is today internet!!)

These vision have not been change. As I said earlier by end of the year, Video Blog would be the fastest growth segment on the web.




"Yahoo! is more than just a search"

Terry Semel, CEO of Yahoo!, the world’s most successful Internet company, is unimpressed by Google’s hype. In an exclusive “Globes” interview, he tells how he saved Yahoo! from collapse, and marks his next target: entering the media field.
Keren Tsuriel-Harari 10 May 05 14:50

Saturday night, April 9, 9:00 pm. Terminal 1 at Ben Gurion Airport is completely deserted. Only in the Massada reception room, which, like most VIP reception rooms, is located in the back of the terminal, where the masses will not disturb the VIPs' rest, is there any movement. There is a representative of the Israel Immigration Police, a group of security men, and someone acting as a host-waiter. The only passengers at the moment, on a private 10:00 pm flight, are Terry Semel and his wife, Jane. Wearing Nike sports shoes, with slightly unkempt hair and several days’ beard on his face, Semel doesn’t look like the chairman and CEO of the world’s largest Internet company, the man who only recently exercised options for at least $230 million, and contributed $25 million to a neuro-psychiatric institute at the University of California.

Semel takes care to stress that he is on a private visit. “My wife and I very much wanted to visit Israel. We came as tourists just to see it, and it’s great; we had a very good time,” he gushes. “We saw quite a lot. We met many people, and visited pretty places. We’re already thinking about the next time.” On the other hand, when an out-of-the-way place like Israel hosts a Jew as highly placed as Semel, public matters becomes intermingled with private ones. Even the security arrangements for getting on the plane are carried out with a maximum of respect and a minimum of bother for the traveling couple. “You can’t do this; he’s the owner of Yahoo!,” one of the security people rebukes his colleagues on his walkie-talkie.

Despite the fact that he is now completely identified with Yahoo!, Semel’s entry into the company wasn’t smooth and easy. While he is responsible, together with Bob Daley, for turning Warner Brothers into the media and entertainment giant that it is today, the rules in Hollywood differ from the rules of the Internet, and the laws governing public companies are very different from those applying to private companies. On the other hand, after 24 years, and given his record, Semel could have arranged a far more glittering job than an Internet company that had got into trouble and had begun a painful streamlining process. Semel’s resume seemingly includes nothing that qualifies him to manage a technology company. “Terry wasn’t looking for a job,” Daley said at the time. “He was looking for a challenge.”

Semel found his challenge, and met it. Within a few quarters, he won a place in Yahoo!’s hall of fame, and put on the best and most enviable show in Silicon Valley. He raised Yahoo! from a rock bottom market cap of just over $4 billion to a company with a market cap of $48 billion, double that of General Motors, the epitome of American industry. He took the company from wrenching losses of tens of millions of dollars to record revenue of $3.57 billion, and a net profit of $840 million. The significance is greater than the increase in the numbers. Semel turned a hard to quantify dot.com phenomenon into a stable, robust moneymaking machine. In a more universal sense, he was making a statement about the health of technology companies. The era when the philosophy of “if you built it, and it attracts a lot of clicks, go on running it,” came to an end. The philosophy of the Semel era is based on a solid economic foundation.

Semel also personally deviates to some degree from the norm for the industry that he leads. When he became chairman and CEO of Yahoo!, he admitted that he usually didn’t use e-mail. “I’m still a beginner in the Internet, but I’ve learned a lot,” he confessed on his visit to Israel. His conduct and management style are more reminiscent of the old-style movie tycoons than those of managers of the world’s largest and fastest growing Internet companies. In contrast to high-tech managers, who love seeing their pictures in the newspapers and reading their chatter with the media, Semel’s motto is “results talk.” An attempt to query whether the dot.com bubble was recurring was rejected on the spot. Semel prefers using old economy expressions.

“I can’t speak for every company, or for the entire Internet, but I think there are several really stable and serious Internet companies, and Yahoo! is one of them. These companies have great business, and are growing consistently year-by-year. These are serious businesses; they’re here to stay, and they have enormous opportunities for growth.”

“Google Doesn’t Frighten Me”

Semel is described as being suspicious of the media, secretive, and standoffish. He is known as somebody who doesn’t usually give interviews to the media. “Yahoo! has the best business model in the Internet,” he said in an interview not long ago, “and it has nothing to do with getting your picture in the paper, but with doing the real thing: performance and consistency in the long term.”

When we sit down for an interview, he really seems ill at ease. His answers are short and correct. “That’s the last question, right?” he hints. On the other hand, he is considered a tough warrior in the market. As Yahoo! COO Dan Rosensweig puts it, “He expects a new fight every day.”

Semel’s biggest and most widely publicized battle was with Google. In mid-2000, when Google was a search engine just past the start-up phase, Yahoo! adopted it as its search engine. Two years afterward, little Google, with its elegant home page, began to sound like a giant, and started primping itself for an IPO. This was one of Semel’s biggest tests: the apprentice was turning on his master, and boasting that he would beat him in a duel. Semel wouldn’t concede. In late 2002, he acquired Inktomi, which develops search technologies, for $235 million. Just over a year ago, he re-launched Inktomi as Yahoo!’s search engine, and said goodbye to Google. Since then, Google has held a successful IPO, touched a $50 billion market cap, and become the media’s darling. Semel, in any case, is not worried about lagging behind. “We’ve been in the search field with our engine for about a year,” he says. “I think we did excellent work during this year, and there will be many developments and innovations.”

Globes: Google has become a tough competitor. The markets and the media like it.

Terry Semel: Google is a very good search company, and Yahoo! is also a very good search company. You musn’t forget, however, that Yahoo! is more than just search. We have many functions, and we have a great many competitors in each function and in each vertical in which we operate, whether it’s news, sports, finance, or games.”

As the technology market revives, this competition will only get stiffer.

Yahoo! is used to competition. I think that good competition is a healthy thing. We hope to be very good in everything we’ve done, and that we’ll do in the future. In general, our goal is to supply our consumers with the best products and services.”

This is where one of the main differences between Yahoo! and Google lies. Google positions itself as a boutique, with a few high-quality services, such as free e-mail with an unprecedented volume of 2 gigabytes. Yahoo! positions itself as a supermarket, in which you can buy any Internet product you want: chat rooms on any topic, news services, travel agencies, bargain sales, a financial portal, sports and television experiences, career management, and finding a job. Yahoo!’s strategy is to offer everything, thereby making itself the default option for everyone who needs something on the Internet. With this strategy, you have to be very good in what you do, but you don’t have to be the best, because excellence lies in the array of functions. “Diversity has paid off for Yahoo!, which has become an Internet destination for finding other sites, and any kind of information,” CBS analyst Larry Magid explains.

There is another significant difference between Yahoo! and Google’s concepts. Google is trying to save and improve the world with its products and solutions. It invests in markets that don’t exist yet. Yahoo! does not purport to change the world; it follows the existing markets that it wants to conquer. “I wake up every morning thinking about what our customers want,” Semel said a few months ago, thereby crowning Yahoo!’s consumers as its formal programmers.

The Future Lies in the Entertainment Industry

Competition between Yahoo! and Google is waning, however, as the companies pick up speed on their divergent roads. Current market wisdom holds that Google is planning to develop computer and Internet infrastructure functions, such as an operating system and browser, in competition with Microsoft. Yahoo!, on the other hand, is going to Hollywood; the company is bolstering its entertainment content. Its biggest competitor is therefore America Online-Time Warner. Last year, Yahoo! founded a new entertainment division, located in Santa Monica, near Hollywood, with enough space to contain a thousand employees. Former ABC Entertainment Television Group chairman Lloyd Braun manages the division, and more managers were recruited from Warner Brothers, Semel’s previous place of employment, to work with Braun. They have already managed to sign a content cooperation agreement with several major studios and producers, such as Mark Burnett, the producer of “The Apprentice” and “Survivor.”

In a rare public comment, Semel confirmed that Yahoo! is moving in the direction of content production. “Yahoo! rests on four basic pages: personalization, large communities of people, content, and search,” he explains. “Over the years, it has invested quite a lot in all of these four pages. This has also left its mark in terms of content.

“Content is something that Yahoo! has always done, whether through licenses, collecting, or on occasion creating our own slices of content for our users. I plan to continue following this route. It’s not new. It’s the same route, but the advantages of broadband enable us to assemble more video, which will be a significant component, and greatly enrich the experience of our consumers. High-speed Internet facilitates a better experience, and enables people to download music and see new things, whether it’s news, sports, or games. We’re there in everything that’s digital and makes it possible for us to supply a better product and provide a better service.”

Is that why you’re cooperating with producers and studios?

Right now, we’re in touch and cooperating with many content companies. We get licensed content from them, whether it’s news, sports, games, pictures, or other activities, and they enable us to do a better job. In the future, we may also connect with the major studios.”

Semel is discreet, and does not provide details, but the market believes that Yahoo! is going for a merger or strategic cooperation with giants, on the America Online-Time-Warner model. For his part, Semel prefers cooperation to a merger. “As an Internet-media company, Yahoo! believes that television networks, movie studios, and music companies should regard it more as a partner than as a candidate for a merger,” he said recently at an investment conference in New York. “I think that there’s another alternative, and Yahoo! is a perfect partner, which can help the conventional media. We don’t want to look like television.” On another occasion, he explained that Yahoo!’s production possibilities will not be movies or television programs, because as a media, the Internet has to be interactive.

In any case, Semel does not believe that the Internet will wipe out the traditional communications media, with which he wants to create close cooperation. Yahoo! will come to this wedding as a strong distribution channel, if not the strongest on the Internet. Yahoo! can distribute exclusive content that relies on the studios (such as 40 minutes of every episode of “The Apprentice”, which is broadcast on the website on the same day as the television broadcast), and joint content. Semel does not disclose in public all his ideas in the field, and the hints that he does throw out are carefully scrutinized. For example, a month and a half ago, he said that Yahoo! believed that that it could create simple content by developing new ways for its hundreds of millions of users to create and distribute their content. He has also made a few non-committal hints about blogs, the latest Internet hit.

Another option emerges from remarks by UBS Warburg analyst Ben Schachter: “I can easily imagine how, in another five years, I’ll be using my credit card to pay Yahoo! to watch a movie premier on my computer.” In any event, regardless of what content Yahoo! produces, “It will have to be more special and smarter” than other mass media, Semel summed up on Yahoo!’s tenth birthday.

As part of its entry into the entertainment game, Yahoo! acquired MusicMatch, a program for downloading and managing music files, for $160 million at the end of last year. “Yahoo! is committed to being the leading player in digital music,” Semel declared at the time. “It matches our strategy of catching the largest consumer audiences when they switch to digital music, and supports our goal of providing consumers with more possibilities for selection, control, and flexibility in the way that they connect with music. This acquisition was one of several innovative products in which Yahoo! will invest in the future in order to build a music portfolio.”

An intriguing aspect of Yahoo!’s entertainment activity came to light during Semel’s visit to Channel 10, the new baby of his friend, movie producer Arnon Milchan. Semel and Milchan, who has become a significant partner in the channel, first became acquainted when Milchan was doing business with Warner Brothers, and distributed its movies. During Semel’s visit, the subject of cooperation with Channel 10 on content was raised. When I asked Semel about the possibility of such cooperation, he was careful not to reveal too much. “They asked, and this is something that I’ll look into after my vacation, when I return to California.” He eventually remarks, “At the moment, I think it’s still not ripe, and I prefer not to comment on it.”

Personalized Internet

While the Yahoo! supermarket continues to expand, offering more and more categories, and more and more products in each in category, Semel is also steeriing the company into personalization. For example, Yahoo! communicates with its customers in over 15 languages, and perhaps, in the future, Hebrew will become a Yahoo! language. Another personal element is making the site more localized. “If you are looking for a plumber or a pizza parlor, you don't want one 3,000 miles away,” Semel explained two months ago. “You want your search to be customized just for you. That means including very large communities and groups representing millions of people having very specific fields of interest. They spend a lot of time on Yahoo! in order to express the same needs.” Bear in mind that a neighborhood website like this will be attractive and hard to replace, and will therefore be attractive to advertisers.

This personalization capability, together with the world’s most advanced technologies for vertical searches, blogs, social networks, and content distribution, is creating what technologically oriented young people love: a page that creates an online identity for a user, with a picture, biography, and blog pages. Such a personal online product is a prodigious advertising anchor, even if its business model is not yet clear. “The potential strategic gain from the blogosphere is substantial, as it could change the way we use the Web… Yahoo! will need to lead in this area if it is to sustain its leadership,” analyst Marianne Wolk writes.

According to Semel, Yahoo! will reinvent both itself and Internet content. “This year, you’ll see more and more links between Yahoo!’s same four basic pages: personalization, communities, content, and search,” he announces. “We’ll enrich the experience and activity of our communities, and enable them to do more than each can do separately. Eventually, before the end of this year, Yahoo! users will be able to not only us these four pages, but also link them to every type of device, so that all the mobile devices in the communications world, including computers, mobile phones, and other mobile devices, can be used with Yahoo!’s four functions.”

Where is the Internet going? Is it shifting from the computer to other devices?

I think that the Internet is becoming more and more relevant to people’s lives. Entire generation are now growing up with the Internet, which is becoming more relevant and significant, regardless of whether it’s on a computer, mobile devices, or in the future becomes part of television. I regard it as the ability of our community to access information and Yahoo!’s Internet functions from wherever they may be in the world, from any device they are using. The possibilities are very far-reaching.”

http://www.globes.co.il/serveEN/globes/docView.asp?did=912745&fid=1724

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

eBay Freud Alert

This is the email I received today.

I have check the property of the originating site. It is not from eBay.

If you are receiving these kind of email. forward a copy to

spoof@ebay.com

Please work hand in hand to get these scammer's behind the bar.




***Urgent Safeharbor Department Notice***

eBay Fraud Mediation Request
Date: 02 May 2005

You have recieved this email because you or someone had used your account to make fake bids at eBay. For security purposes, we are required to open an investigation into this matter.

THE FRAUD ALERT ID CODE CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE WILL BE ATTACHED IN OUR FRAUD MEDIATION REQUEST FORM, IN ORDER TO VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT REGISTRATION INFORMATIONS.

Fraud Alert ID CODE: 00937614
(Please save this Fraud Alert ID Code for your reference.)

To help speed up this process, please access the following form to complete the verification of your account registration informations:

http://scgi.ebay.com/verify_id=ebay &fraud alert id code=00937614

.
Please Note:
If we do not receive the appropriate account verification within 48 hours, than we will assume this account is fraudulent and will be suspended.
The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your account has not been fraudulently used and to combat the fraud from our community.

We appreciate your support and understanding, as we work together to keep eBay a safe place to trade.

Thank you for your patience in this matter.

Regards, Safeharbor Department (Trust and Safety Department)


Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.



Copyright © 2005 Ebay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Ebay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc. Ebay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

Hard Work Can Restore The News Business

That is for sure, Hardwork & consistencies would help a business & person to the eventual success.

With the RSS & Feeds, informations be it Hard or Soft products would be able to get to the contacts & friends instantly. That means that those informations seater would be out of place. Yor interface with your contacts would be directly through the blogs.

Those businesses & individual who failed to tap the power of Internet & blog or RSS Feeds would be left out!!





Hume: Hard work can restore the news business
By Ben Rubin
North Adams Transcript

Saturday, April 30, 2005 - NORTH ADAMS -- In her lecture, "Talk Shows, Blogs and the Future of News," at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts on Thursday, writer and journalist Ellen Hume said many new streams of media are getting all the attention, though they are basically regurgitation machines for the more traditional forms of news.

Hume said that 25 percent of ABC's news is generated by its own news staff, 54 percent for CNN and 14 percent for Fox News. A measly 1 percent of all the news found online is uniquely produced by Web site staff writers.

While the ominously, cynically nicknamed Main Stream Media (MSM) or Legacy Media is mocked by its spry, sassy younger brother, the bloggers and Internet news sources are actually working off big bro's stories. Think about this: AOL and Yahoo! edged out CNN and the New York Times as the most used Internet news sources -- but who are they posting on their sites?

There's more, of course. Hume, like many media pundits, says the news is in crisis.

"Having the watchdog bark at everything mean we've lost our bite," she said. "Too much time with Scott Peterson, not enough time with Rwanda."

In what she coined as the "attention economy," the race for the public's eyes and ears generally degenerates to simply a race to the bottom. Serious discourse isn't working it seems, and so the media needs to prod at people with antics to get them to listen, she said.

In this distopian milieu, newsrooms opt for White House press packages, ranting political extremists on cheap-to-run opinion shows and very little verification and fact checking in the daily struggle to "fill their news hole," said Hume.

"We're killing ourselves with entertainment," Hume said. "We're going for the ice cream, instead of the vegetables."

Hume said that the bells and whistles of the new news brings the viewer lost in distraction, a problem easily recognizable in Fox News' dramatic, thumping music or splash of colorful graphics, eerily reminiscent to "Demolition Man's" mocking take on futuristic news.

The blogger phenomenon means anybody and everybody can become a journalist, not with years of groveling and mandatory trips to the local deli, but with one quick jaunt to blogster.com. Hume said that the innovation of Internet news has washed away accountability -- we don't even know who these bloggers are, let alone their credentials.

With the current status of the news and the fog of blog, real news, good news is "having a hard time finding its economic footing," Hume said. Still, while Hume related theories that the news in the future will only be a subsidiary of the mega-global corporation known simply as Googlezon (Google and Amazon), or be used only when viewers don't get one of Jon Stewart's jokes, she said she remains optimistic that good news will survive.

Good news, Hume said, isn't as flashy or fun, and is more costly than maintaining the status quo, but people need it and deserve it. She said journalism at its best is independent -- independent from corporate ownership and independent from sources -- proportionate (think Michael Jackson trial); verified, transparent and accountable. The ultimate goal of a journalist is to be a skeptic, and to denounce and expose those who try to mislead the public, she said.

From consumers and digesters of the daily news, Hume suggested as much critical consideration as she expected from reporters. Ironically, it's easier to find everything nowadays, except the truth. Be a smart shopper, get a variety of news sources and look in places that aren't just a reinforcement of your niche lifestyle, she said.

Hume added that if consumers wanted good journalism, they have to participate by supporting the news financially and complaining about the news when they're not happy with it.

"Consumers beware, journalists -- remember, what your job really is, because if you don't do it, who will?" Hume said.

Hume served as the White House and political correspondent for The Wall Street Journal from 1983 to 1988 and a national reporter with the Los Angeles Times from 1977 and 1983. She was a weekly analyst on CNN's "Reliable Sources," a panelist on PBS's "Washington Week in Review" and periodically visited NBC's "Meeting the Press."

A recipient of many awards, Hume has worked in the media for 30 years and is currently the director of the Center on Media and Society at the University of Massachusetts-Boston.